Archive for the ‘astronomy’ Category

h1

Curiosity takes us to Mars

7 August 2012

You’ve seen plenty of media coverage already about NASA‘s Curiosity rover landing safely on Mars. It went better than they’d hoped. Now the robot will sniff around the red planet for signs that life might ever have existed there. What it finds could tell us all sorts of things about how life began here on Earth, or about the likelihood of life elsewhere in the universe.

Its primary mission will last one Martian year (about 98 of our weeks, nearly two Earth years). But with some luck it’ll keep going longer than that.

You can read about how the mission’s going on NASA’s mission web site; here’s part of today’s:

On its first Martian day, designated Sol 0, the rover is checking its health and measuring its tilt. All Sol 0 spacecraft activities appear to have been completely nominal. These include firing all of Curiosity’s pyrotechnic devices for releasing post-landing deployments. Spring-loaded deployments, such as removal of dust covers from the Hazard-Avoidance cameras (Hazcams) occur immediately when pyros are fired. Curiosity also took images with its front and rear Hazcams both before and after removal of the dust covers, checked out its UHF telecommunications system and rover motor controller assembly, and completed all activities required to proceed with its planned activities on Sol 1. Approximately five megabytes of data were successfully relayed back to Earth from NASA’s Mars Odyssey spacecraft during its overpass today.

Activities planned for Sol 1 during the mission’s approximately one-month characterization activity phase include deploying Curiosity’s high-gain antenna, collecting science data from Curiosity’s Radiation Assessment Detector and Rover Environmental Monitoring Station instruments, and obtaining additional imagery. The mission’s characterization activity phase is design to learn how all Curiosity’s subsystems and instruments are functioning after landing and within the environment and gravitational field of Mars.

There are lots of photos of Curiosity’s surroundings on Mars too, though you can’t get away from them if you’re near a TV or newspaper these days. I’m looking forward to a constant stream of fascinating info from Curiosity.

Curiosity’s first color image of the Martian landscape. This view of the landscape to the north of NASA’s Mars rover Curiosity was acquired by the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) on the afternoon of the first day after landing. In the distance, the image shows the north wall and rim of Gale Crater. The image is murky because the MAHLI’s removable dust cover is apparently coated with dust blown onto the camera during the rover’s terminal descent. Images taken without the dust cover in place are expected during checkout of the robotic arm in coming weeks. Click the image above to embiggen.

h1

European space concepts enter competition

27 February 2011

From the BBC: the European Space Agency has selected four new mission concepts to compete for a launch opportunity at the start of the 2020s.

  • Large Observatory For X-ray Timing (LOFT): The mission would go after the fast-moving, high-energy environments that surround black holes, neutron stars and pulsars – objects that can produce sudden and very rapid bursts of X-rays. By observing this emission, scientists would hope to address questions related to fundamental physics: they could probe the effects of matter entering ultra-strong gravitational fields and ultra-dense states. They could also measure more accurately the mass and spin of black holes; and in the case of the biggest such objects in the Universe, this has something interesting to say about how they, and the galaxies that host them, formed.
  • Space-Time Explorer and Quantum Equivalence Principle Space Test (STE-Quest): Again, this mission would address some big physics topics. One objective would be to test “the equivalence principle”, which underpins several fundamental assumptions including the idea that gravity will accelerate all objects in a vacuum equally regardless of their masses or the materials from which they are made. The Apollo 15 astronaut Dave Scott famously demonstrated this principle when he dropped a hammer and feather on the Moon in 1971 and both hit the surface at the same time. STE-Quest would put very sensitive instrumentation on an orbiting to do a far more precise test of whether gravity really is so blind or perhaps varies on some scales.
  • MarcoPolo-R: This is an idea that has been around for a while. The mission would attempt to return a sample of material from an asteroid for detailed analysis in Earth laboratories. The most primitive asteroids contain geochemistry not observable in Earth rocks because they are constantly recycled. As such, asteroids can tell scientists a lot about conditions in the early Solar System, and about the original “stuff” that went into making the planets billions of years ago. One potential target is actually two asteroids in close proximity – a binary known as (175706) 1996FG3. The larger rock is about 1.5km across; its companion is less than half a km in diameter.
  • Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory (ECHO): This is a 1.2m telescope that would study planets circling far-away stars. In recent years, hundreds of these so-called exoplanets have been detected, but we no precious little about them yet. Echo would observe the planets as they moved in front of their stars. From the way the light is attenuated, the telescope’s detectors would be able to probe the atmospheres of these worlds. Echo would look for the presence of molecules such as ozone and carbon dioxide in the atmospheres. These and other markers might tell us something about whether any of the exoplanets have conditions capable of supporting life.

 

h1

Biggest colour night-sky image ever

13 January 2011

It’s cool space news time over at the BBC:

Astronomers have released the largest ever colour image of the whole sky, stitched from seven million images, each made of 125 million pixels.

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey has helped to identify hundreds of millions of cosmic objects. Researchers have also released an animation on YouTube demonstrating how the incredibly high-resolution image is represented on the celestial sphere.

h1

Physics laws local?

14 September 2010

According to a New Scientist article there are some preliminary astronomy results that at least one of the universal “constants” may be different in different parts of the universe.

At the centre of the new study is the fine structure constant, also known as alpha. This number determines the strength of interactions between light and matter.

A decade ago, Webb used observations from the Keck telescope in Hawaii to analyse the light from distant galaxies called quasars. The data suggested that the value of alpha was very slightly smaller when the quasar light was emitted 12 billion years ago than it appears in laboratories on Earth today.

Now Webb’s colleague Julian King, also of the University of New South Wales, has analysed data from the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, which looks at a different region of the sky. The VLT data suggests that the value of alpha elsewhere in the universe is very slightly bigger than on Earth.

h1

Astronomy photography of the year

10 September 2010

Each year the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, UK, holds an astronomy photography competition. This year’s nominations are no less stunning than any other year.

h1

New techniques for finding new planets

10 July 2010

One of the astronomical activities that excites me most is the search for other planets outside our solar system. I’ve mentioned the Kepler probe before as one example – and, so far, a very successful one – of this planet-hunting.

But how do we find these planets? Although we have some pretty powerful telescopes planets are, relative to their distance in other star systems, very small. Experiments like Kepler find planets by making use of the fact that these planets – like the planets in our solar system – orbit around their stars. Sometimes those orbits line up so that when we’re looking at that system’s star the planet moves through our field of vision, across the front of our view of the star. If it does we can’t see the planet itself (it’s still too small) but we can see a tiny drop in the brightness of the star. But measuring how much the star’s brightness diminishes we can get an idea of how big it is. By measuring how frequently it transits in front of its star we can get an idea of how long its orbit takes. They can still only detect fairly large planets this way, though.

Now scientists in Germany, Bulgaria and Poland have developed another method to find even smaller planets. If there are other, smaller planets in a system where they’ve already detected a large planet using the transit method, then the smaller planets will make their presence felt – via gravity – on the large planet. The tugs of gravity will affect the orbit of the large planet and we’ll observe variations in the timing of the large planet’s orbit. Using computer models we can then infer the presence of the small planets, despite being far too small to see directly.

[via ScienceDaily]

h1

Flags and stars

18 June 2010

This post on Scienceblogs’ Starts With a Bang talks about national flags around the world that have stars – or, even more accurately, constellations – on them.

It also talks about the different tips to find the north and south polar stars using constellations as guides. Having lived most of my life in the northern hemisphere I was aware of the simple method for finding Polaris: you use the two edge stars of the Big Dipper to point the way.

It looks like finding the southern celestial pole is trickier, though, with a complicated combination of the Southern Cross and two nearby “pointer stars”. I’m eager to wait for clearer nightime skies to give that a try.

h1

Kepler: the first data, and hundreds of possible new planets

16 June 2010

Remember Kepler? It’s the space probe with a mission to locate planets that are similar to our own (which are our best bet to start looking for life, or at least life we’d recognise). It launched in March 2009, and started looking in June of that year.

NASA has been collecting, reviewing, and categorising that data. Today they’ve released the first bit of it.

Here’s a summary from Dynamics of Cats: check that out for links to more detail.

306 new candidate exoplanets, with 5 multiple transiting systems – ie stars with more than one planet transiting them.

The really interesting systems though are the 400 objects that the Kepler team got permission to withhold, and the data on which will be released later.

Statistically 100+ of those ought to be real planets, and probably the most interesting of all the exoplanets they found.

h1

Scientists detect water on the surface of an asteroid

29 April 2010

From the BBC:

The first-time observation was made on 24 Themis, a huge rock that orbits almost 480 million km out from the Sun.

h1

Hubble: 20 years of awesome

28 April 2010

Twenty years ago last week the Hubble Space Telescope was launched. It’s been an awesome scientific tool, and a well-known symbol of astronomic achievement. It’s told us a lot about the universe.

Hey Hubble, thanks.

Whirlpool Galaxy as photographed by Hubble. Click to enlarge.

h1

Stunning pictures of the Sun

25 April 2010

NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory – launched into space on February 11 – has sent back some amazing images of our Sun. Click here for several series of animated images that show flares, eruptions, and thermal currents, captured in spectra we can’t see with our own eyes. The Sun is an incredibly dynamic furnace is the sky, and is constantly churning and flaring and bubbling away up there.

Click to enlarge

h1

Prospects for extraterrestrial life: there are a lot of rocky planets out there

20 April 2010

ScienceDaily has an article that explains why the prospects for the existence of other life in our galaxy just got a bit better.

In brief:

  1. We believe that planets that are mostly “rocky” (as opposed to gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn) and have water are the places where we’re most likely to find other life in the universe. This is because the only planet we yet know to contain life – our own Earth – is like this.
  2. Although we’re discovering more planets all the time most of them are extremely small and far away, so it’s slow going. Spotting stars – because they’re bigger and give off lots of radiation – is much easier.
  3. We’ve now seen that lots of white dwarf stars – which is the final stage of most normal stars (our Sun is one of those stars) – contain significant traces of heavy “rocky” elements and water. This implies that the systems around those stars once had rocky planets and water. That means such systems are quite common. And that boosts the chances that there’s life out there.

From the article:

Dr Farihi comments: “In our own Solar System with at least one watery, habitable planet, the asteroid belt — the leftover building blocks of the terrestrial planets — is several percent water by mass. From our study of white dwarfs, it appears there are basic similarities found among asteroid-like objects around other stars; hence it is likely a fraction of these white dwarfs once harbored watery planets, and possibly life.”

h1

Does Our Universe Live Inside a Wormhole?

12 April 2010

Science magazine is reporting a new paper from Indiana University’s Nikodem Poplawski that speculates about whether our universe might exist in a wormhole between two other universes.

Poplawski thinks this idea is worth speculation because it provides possible explanations (or, at least, gives us room to manoeuvre) on two current problems: the unification of gravity with the nuclear and electromagnetic forces, and dark energy.

It all sounds like a bit of a stretch, an attempt to come up with scenarios that fit the facts. But that is one way discoveries are made.

h1

DIY space photography

29 March 2010

Robert Harrison, in the UK, was clever and persistent enough to wrap his camera in insulation, program it to periodically turn on and snap some photos, attach a GPS to it, and strap it to a high-altitude weather balloon.

The result? Amazing space photos, a media spotlight, and some phone calls from NASA.

h1

Northern and Southern Lights observed on Saturn at the same time

14 February 2010

I’m going to start with some of the fundamentals on this one, and build towards the titular observation.

Everyone’s familiar with magnets. I’m not, in this post, going to drill down into the Standard Model view of electromagnetism; let’s just go with what we know, that some things – like iron – can produce strong magnetic fields.

The Earth is one of those things that produces a magnetic field. It has one mostly because of the molten metal that’s moving around beneath the surface. The Earth ends up being pretty close to a magnetic dipole, like one of those bar magnets you played with in science class in school, so named because it has a north and south pole (that is, its field has an orientation, and each “end” of the magnetic field acts differently). The Earth’s like that too, with two concentrations of the magnetic field lines all collecting at places somewhat close-ish to the geographic north and south poles.

At the same time we’ve got the Sun producing something called the solar wind. That’s the name given to the constant stream of charged particles – electrons and protons, mostly – that are streaming away from the Sun all the time. They’re coming at the Earth, and everything else in the solar system, all the time. Those particles are affected by magnetic fields, though. If they come close to the Earth’s magnetic poles, the shape and strength of the field in those spots can be just enough pull them into our atmosphere. If they do, and the particles smash into oxygen and nitrogen atoms in our air, they can combine and give off a flash of energy that may manifest itself as visible light. That is what we call the Northern (or Southern) Lights, or the aurora borealis (or australis).

But many planets have a magnetic field, and the solar wind blows everywhere, so it’s not just our planet that has these aurora. Saturn has them too, but we weren’t able to see them until 1997. This is because when the charged particles from the solar wind get caught in Saturn’s magnetic field they slam into different atoms, and the flash of energy they give off isn’t visible light, but ultraviolet light of a frequency that gets absorbed in our atmosphere. The first time Saturn’s aurorae were seen was from the Hubble telescope (which, because it’s in space outside our atmosphere, can see that UV light).

Last year, however, Saturn was in just the right spot that its rings and equator were edge-on from our point of view. This meant that we could see the aurorae of both poles at the same time. In doing so we were able to detect differences in the north and south aurora. These observations may help us understand the aurora phenomenon, the solar wind, and the internal structure of Saturn.

Here’s a short video of the Hubble images of both aurorae at once.

Or you can click through to this Guardian Science article that has a longer and more detailed explanation from NASA.

h1

Photographs of Mars

13 February 2010

From Presidia Creative, look at these amazing photos of Mars, collected by telescope or probe.

Here’s one to whet your appetite:

h1

Star Viewer

18 January 2010

Star Viewer is a cool web page for people who still get a thrill from astronomy. Using Google Maps’ engine you can move around and zoom in on all the most famous astronomical galaxies, nebula, and stars.

Black eye galaxy. Click to enlarge

If you like this, check out the Lifehacker article that lists some other web-based astronomy tools.

h1

Boat could explore Saturn moon

23 December 2009

From the BBC:

A daring proposal to try to put a “boat” down on a sea of Saturn’s moon Titan is about to be submitted to Nasa.

The scientific team behind the idea is targeting Ligeia Mare, a vast body of liquid methane sited in the high north of Saturn’s largest moon.

The concept will be suggested to the US space agency for one of its future mission opportunities that will test a novel power system.

It would be the first exploration of a planetary sea beyond Earth.

They put “boat” in quotes like they don’t really mean a boat, but they do. A boat is a vessel that rides the boundary between two fluids of greatly different density, so this explorer would definitely be a boat.

Why do we care about methane lakes on Titan?

According to team-member Dr Ralph Lorenz, what we learn from Titan’s lakes could be relevant here on Earth.

It would give scientists the opportunity to study shared climate processes at work under very different conditions.

“If we have models that will work on Earth and on Titan then we can be much more confident that those models understand the fundamentals of what’s going on,” explained the researcher from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

“The photogenic appeal and the mystique of exploring a sea on another world speak for themselves, but there is a genuine practical application to do with the science that will help us address problems here on Earth.”

h1

Getting a clearer view of supermassive black holes at the centres of galaxies

12 December 2009

Most people have heard of black holes: when a big chunk of matter (like a star) no longer has sufficient internal pressure to withstand its own gravity it can collapse and suck in anything that comes past a line called its event horizon. They’re weird, freaky things, to be sure, but theory predicted them, and astronomy has found enough evidence that it’s treated as certain that we can see a bunch of them out there.

Supermassive black holes – in addition to being a great song by Muse – are enormous black holes thought to exist at the centre of most, if not all, galaxies. There are signs of them, and a few models for how they might form.

Scientists have recently been able to better see what’s happening at the edge of some of these supermassive black holes. They’ve done this by cleverly using two nearby telescopes, the Keck telescopes in Hawaii. This technique, called interferometry, allows them to remove the effects of the stuff – much of which is creating a lot of radiation “noise” – that’s happening nearby.

Keck Telescopes. Photo from domesticat via Creative Commons license

h1

Probe slams into Moon, looking for evidence of ice

9 October 2009

For the last 113 days Nasa’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) spacecraft has been traveling towards the moon. Its mission is to find out whether there might be some traces of water buried under the dirt of some of the craters that dapple the Moon’s surface.

At a distance of 54,000 miles LCROSS separated from the rocket that had propelled it from Earth to Moon. The rocket hurted downwards and slammed into the Moon’s surface, sending up a cloud of dust and rocks (and, possibly, frozen ice particles). LCROSS’s instruments observed and recorded this aftermath of the impact, then a few minutes later itself plowed into the Moon.

It’ll take weeks to analyse all the data LCROSS took and sent back. But it looks like a good result so far with just the sort of data capture they were hoping for, with the plume of dust spotted by the sister-mission Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO).

Read all about it on ScienceDaily.

Illustration of LCROSS

Illustration of LCROSS

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 809 other followers